Health in Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Action

2025 report

share this on:

The Sustainable Development Goals

The United Nations’ 2025 report on progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals states that none of the 17 SDGs will be achieved by 2030.

An analysis of progress towards the various SDG targets shows just how far we are from meeting the commitments made.

With five years to go until the end of the 2030 Agenda, most of the targets are far from being met: only 35% of the 137 SDG targets are showing good or moderate progress, 47% of the targets have made marginal or no progress, and most seriously, 18% of the targets have regressed and are in a worse state than in 2015, when the baseline figures were established.

Recommendations

Achieving the 2030 Agenda requires strengthening monitoring and accountability mechanisms, focusing efforts on the targets that are lagging furthest behind.

At the same time, it is essential to promote global public goods and tackle common ills—such as disinformation—through political commitments linked to clear and verifiable indicators.

All of this must be underpinned by a broader mobilisation of financial, technological and human resources, capable of ensuring sustainable and equitable progress.

SDG 3 on health and well-being

SDG 3, ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all, is progressing more slowly than the Sustainable Development Goals as a whole. Only 10% of its targets have been met or are on track to be met, whilst 15% show no progress at all.

Since 2000, maternal mortality has fallen by 40% and infant mortality by 52%. However, every day 712 women die from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth, and 13,150 children die from mostly preventable causes, concentrated mainly in impoverished countries.

Inequality in access to healthcare is evident: in 2022, 31% of public health expenditure in low-income countries depended on international aid, which barely bridges the enormous gap with high-income countries, whose health budgets are 70 times larger.


recommendations

To accelerate progress towards SDG 3, it is necessary to Strengthen national health systems through investment in infrastructure, healthcare staff and universal access to basic services, particularly in low-income countries. Increase international cooperation, ensuring that external aid is stable, predictable and aimed at reducing structural inequalities. Promote health equity, prioritising interventions targeting women, children and vulnerable communities where preventable deaths are most frequent. Drive innovation and technology transfer, facilitating access to medicines, vaccines and medical technologies in countries with fewer resources. And finally, strengthen accountability by establishing transparent monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. .

Drastic reduction in ODA

The drastic reduction in Official Development Assistance, overnight, will have immediate consequences for people’s lives and health.

The Trump administration’s decision to end 83% of USAID projects has led to the suspension of numerous health programmes, with the risk of causing up to 14 million additional deaths by 2030, 32% of whom would be children under five, severely affecting low-income countries, where international cooperation is an essential pillar for sustaining fragile health systems.


Recommendations

Funding cuts are putting pressure on the United Nations system and, consequently, on multilateral institutions such as the WHO, which will have to redouble its efforts to maintain its capacity to respond.

In this context, initiatives such as the Pandemic Agreement take on strategic importance. In addition to strengthening global preparedness for future health crises, it highlights the value of coordinated action by multilateral institutions for the common good.

Global Action Plan on Climate Change and Health

The scientific evidence on the links between climate change and health is becoming increasingly robust, reinforcing the urgency of adapting health systems to this new reality.

WHO is promoting a Global Action Plan on Climate Change and Health, which aims to foster climate-smart health systems that not only respond to the impacts of climate change but also help to mitigate them, for example by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, health systems account for 5% of global emissions, which highlights their role in the climate crisis.

This Plan goes beyond the strictly health-related sphere, as it is based on the ‘One Health’ approach, integrating human, animal and planetary health, and calls for profound transformations in our societies, challenging the consumerist model of unlimited growth that currently prevails.

Recommendations

To address the growing impacts of climate change on health, it is essential to Decarbonize health systems, by incorporating renewable energy and sustainable supply chains; strengthen their resilience, by adapting infrastructure and services to respond to extreme weather events; Integrate the “One Health” approach into public policies, coordinating actions between human, animal, and environmental health; Drive green innovation, promoting sustainable medical technologies and clinical practices with a smaller ecological footprint; Promote education and awareness, training both healthcare staff and the general population on climate risks; and review development models, moving towards circular and sustainable economies that reduce pressure on ecosystems and ensure greater health equity.

Crisis of Multilateralism

The crisis in multilateralism and the weakening of international institutions pose a direct threat to the ability to coordinate global responses to pandemics and health emergencies.

The withdrawal of some countries from organisations such as WHO, coupled with budget cuts, has undermined their legitimacy and effectiveness, increasing the fragility of the international system at a time when cooperation is needed more than ever.

Reforming and strengthening these institutions is essential to ensure they can respond swiftly, transparently and credibly, whilst encouraging the active participation of all states and civil society in decision-making.

recomendaciones

The crisis in multilateralism and the weakening of institutions such as WHO have jeopardised the ability to coordinate global responses to pandemics and health emergencies, increasing the fragility of the international system at a critical juncture.

To reverse this trend, it is necessary to strengthen stable and sustainable funding for international organisations, promote governance reforms that enhance their legitimacy, transparency and representativeness, and encourage the active participation of all countries and civil society in decision-making.

It is also essential to promote binding cooperation mechanisms, develop early warning and global coordination systems underpinned by technological innovation, and defend multilateralism as a global public good, emphasising its importance in the face of the risks of fragmentation and nationalism.

International cooperation

The 6.9% reduction in Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2024, equivalent to a decrease of $15.119 billion compared to the previous year, constitutes a historic and unprecedented decline in absolute terms and the third-largest percentage drop in the history of the DAC.

In 2024, ODA from DAC countries stood at just 0.33% of Gross National Income (GNI), far short of the international commitment of 0.7% set by the United Nations for 2030.

The fall of 0.04 percentage points compared to 2023 reflects a sustained decline that seriously undermines the credibility of donor countries and the viability of the 2030 Agenda. The fact that only four of the thirty-one DAC countries have met the target highlights a lack of political will and a disconnect between rhetoric and action.

The OECD’s forecast of a 17% reduction in total ODA, combined with the historic cut by the United States (US$50 billion in a single year, equivalent to 92% of its aid) and those announced by several European countries (an additional US$17.5 billion), suggests that 2025 could become the worst year in history for international cooperation.



recommendations

To reverse this downward trend in ODA, countries must define binding national roadmaps, with clear timetables and verifiable interim targets towards meeting the 0.7% target; guarantee stable and predictable contributions to multilateral cooperation that strengthen the capacity of multilateral organisations; and safeguard humanitarian aid, ensuring it is not treated as a budget line to be cut.

Without a genuine and sustained commitment, international cooperation risks becoming nothing more than empty rhetoric in the face of shared challenges.

ODA for health

In 2023, ODA allocated to health by DAC countries fell by 44% compared to 2022, standing at $15.514 billion and reducing its share to 8.7% of total bilateral aid, half that of the previous year.

Allocable ODA for health fell by 34% compared to 2022, dropping back to 2010 levels in total terms and to 2006 levels in the multilateral sphere. We are witnessing a historic setback that takes us back more than a decade.


The cuts affected not only the response to COVID-19, but also key programmes targeting sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV/AIDS. This trend demonstrates that, despite the lessons of the pandemic, there is still no sustained and coherent strategy on global health.


recommendations

To reverse this situation, it is essential to safeguard the health sector and treat it as a strategic priority within international cooperation. Health cannot be managed as a flexible budget line that is cut in times of crisis, because its impact is felt immediately in terms of human lives and the stability of public health systems.

To this end, it is necessary to make commitments that ensure health funding remains stable over time, avoiding political volatility; to safeguard funding for initiatives against communicable diseases (HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis) and emerging diseases, which require continuity to be effective; and to link health cooperation with the ‘One Health’ approach, which connects human, animal and environmental health.

Spanish official development assistance

In 2024, Spanish ODA reached €4,021 million, an increase of 11.8% compared to the previous year. Although this growth is positive in absolute terms, the percentage of GNI remains at just 0.25%.

This means that Spain remains far from meeting its international, parliamentary and legislative commitments: the 0.55% target set for this parliamentary term ending in 2027 and the 0.7% target set out in the Cooperation Act for 2030.

The gap with the EU average (0.47%) and the DAC average (0.33%) reflects a lack of convergence with international standards and jeopardises the credibility of Spanish cooperation.

Evolution of Spanish gross ODA and percentage of GNI 2006-2024

recommendations

There is an urgent need to design and implement a binding budgetary roadmap, with clear and verifiable annual increases, to enable these commitments to be progressively met.

This roadmap must be robust and accompanied by accountability mechanisms to ensure that the objectives are not undermined by potential changes in the political cycle.

Health in Spanish cooperation

ODA allocated to health has seen an absolute increase of €29 million, reaching €276.7 million. This growth does not translate into a proportional increase within Spanish cooperation as a whole, where health accounts for a relative share of just 6.87%, clearly below the DAC average of 8.9%.

It is worth noting that, of the total allocated to health, the AECID allocates 96.3 million euros, representing 16.3% of its budget, a percentage that clearly reflects the priority given by the Agency to the health sector, in line with the global challenges we face.

Analysis of trends in Spanish gross ODA for health, 2004–2024

 

recommendations

There is an urgent need to increase the sectoral allocation to health within ODA, setting a minimum target of 10% in line with international standards and moving towards the 12% recommended to address global challenges.

To this end, an explicit commitment is required to the challenges facing the sector, as set out in the Global Health Strategy and the Master Plan.

Unprecedented worsening of the humanitarian situation

2024 has seen an unprecedented worsening of humanitarian crises, marked by an increase in violence against the civilian population, obstacles to humanitarian access and systematic attacks on health personnel and infrastructure.

The scale of the needs—more than 323 million people requiring assistance—contrasts with a significant reduction in international funding, which has left millions of people in critical situations without support.

Regions such as Eastern and Southern Africa, the Middle East and Asia account for the greatest needs, reflecting how the climate crisis and protracted conflicts are deepening vulnerability and putting the survival of millions of people at risk. Forecasts for 2025 paint a grim picture: more than 305 million people will need humanitarian assistance, whilst food insecurity continues to rise and famine is re-emerging for the first time since 2020.

Against this backdrop, it is incomprehensible that international humanitarian funding fell in 2024 compared to 2023, reaching only $36.367 billion. Although the United States significantly increased its contribution and consolidated its position as the leading donor, accounting for 38.9% of the total, most major donors reduced their contributions, reinforcing a downward trend that critically affects the sector’s capacity to respond to increasingly complex and protracted crises.

recommendations

It is therefore more important than ever that donors fulfil their international responsibilities and commitments by increasing funding for humanitarian action.

Only then it will be possible to reduce the growing gap between the resources requested and those actually received, and to ensure an adequate response to the needs of the most vulnerable populations.

Cuts and reform of the humanitarian system

The sharp reduction in funding — particularly following the closure of USAID and cuts by other donors — has left the humanitarian sector with an alarming funding gap: by mid-November 2025, only 25.1% of the funds requested to meet humanitarian needs had been received, 21.9% of those requested for food security, and 17.5% for nutrition.

The ‘humanitarian reset’ promoted by OCHA in response to these cuts has focused more on the hyper-prioritisation of resources than on a strategic reform of the system.

As a result, millions of people are left without coverage, whilst the humanitarian space is weakened and increasingly constrained by political and geopolitical interests.

recommendations

It is essential to demand that donors allocate at least 10% of their ODA to humanitarian action and that they fund aid guided by humanitarian principles, not by other interests.

Only in this way can we move towards a humanitarian system that is more inclusive, fair and accountable to those affected by humanitarian crises.

Health in Humanitarian Action

The health sector in humanitarian action is facing a critical funding crisis at a time when health needs have intensified due to conflicts, natural disasters and disease outbreaks.

In 2024, funding allocated to health by the international community fell by $651 million compared to 2023, leaving millions of people without coverage.

This reduction has occurred both in UN appeals —$172 million less than in 2023— and in funding allocated outside the UN system —$479 million less—.

recommendations

Reversing these cuts is essential to ensure an adequate response to the growing health needs.

Sufficient, sustained funding is required, accompanied by improvements in the flexibility and predictability of aid, so that the sector can respond more effectively and in a timely manner to the health crises facing the most vulnerable populations.

The healthcare system as a target of war

The protection of healthcare in conflicts is enshrined in international humanitarian law. However, attacks and violence against healthcare systems are carried out with total impunity.

Over the last three years, attacks on healthcare in conflict settings have increased alarmingly, both in frequency and severity.

In 2024 alone, 3,623 violent incidents were recorded, with 1,100 medical facilities damaged or destroyed, more than 900 healthcare workers killed in 27 countries and 470 detained in 15 countries.



recommendations

At a time and in a context where international norms are being systematically violated, governments, the UN and human rights bodies must increase diplomatic pressure on state and non-state actors responsible for, or suspected of, perpetrating attacks against h n healthcare.

Where these efforts prove unsuccessful, additional legal measures should be considered, including trade restrictions, sanctions and public condemnation, to curb impunity and protect the humanitarian space.

Humanitarian Action by Spanish Cooperation

In 2024, Spanish Cooperation in Humanitarian Action as a whole (AGE, CC. AA. and EE. LL.) fell by 20% compared to 2023, dropping from €213,777,954 to €174,175,615.

This decline once again places the percentage of ODA allocated to humanitarian action below 5%, specifically at 4.33%, representing a fall of 1.6 percentage points compared to the previous year.


The General State Administration (AGE) was primarily responsible for this cut, with a reduction of 24% compared to 2023, whilst Spanish decentralised cooperation (autonomous communities and local authorities) increased its contribution to ODA by €1.4 million, allocating 10.63% of its ODA.



Trend in Spanish ODA Allocated to Humanitarian Action

 

recommendations

Spanish Cooperation must urgently reverse the cuts to humanitarian action and significantly and sustainably increase its funding. Only in this way will it be able to come close, even if only minimally, to the target of allocating 10% of ODA to humanitarian action by the end of the legislative term.

Keeping humanitarian funding below this threshold makes Spanish cooperation complicit in perpetuating a critical gap between the needs of affected populations and the resources available, weakening the capacity to respond to increasingly complex and protracted crises.